What Has Gone Awry at Zipcar – and the UK Vehicle-Sharing Market Dead?

The volunteer food project in Rotherhithe has been delivering a large number of prepared dishes each week for two years to elderly residents and needy locals in south London. Yet, the group's plans face major disruption by the announcement that they will not have cars and vans on New Year’s Day.

This organization depended on Zipcar, the app-based vehicle rental service that allowed its cars via smartphone. It sent shockwaves across London when it said it would shut down its UK business from 1 January.

It will mean many volunteers cannot collect food from the Felix Project, that collects excess produce from grocery stores, cafes and restaurants. Obvious alternatives are less convenient, costlier, or do not offer the same flexible hours.

“The impact will be massively,” said Vimal Pandya, the community kitchen’s founder. “My team and I are worried about the operational hurdle we will face. Many groups like ours will face difficulties.”

“Faced with this reality, they are all worried and thinking: ‘How will we continue?’”

A Major Blow for City Vehicle Clubs

The community kitchen’s drivers are part of over 500,000 people in London who were car club members, now potentially left without convenient access to vehicles, without the hassle and cost of ownership. Most of those people were probably with Zipcar, which held a dominant position in the city.

This shutdown, pending consultation with employees, is a serious setback to hopes that car sharing in cities could cut the need for private vehicle ownership. Yet, some experts also suggested that Zipcar’s exit need not spell the end for the concept in Britain.

The Promise of Car Sharing

Shared vehicle use is prized by many urbanists and environmentalists as a way of reducing the problems linked to vehicle ownership. Most cars sit as two-tonne dead weights on the side of the road for 95% of the time, using up space. They also involve large CO2 output to produce, and people who do not own cars tend to use active travel and take public transport more. That helps urban areas – easing congestion and pollution – and improves people’s health through more exercise.

Understanding the Decline

The company started in 2000 before its acquisition by the US car rental group Avis Budget in 2013. Zipcar’s UK income were minimal compared with its parent company's overall annual revenue, and a deficit that grew to £11.7m in 2024 gave little incentive to continue.

The parent company stated the closure is part of a “broader transformation across our global operations, where we are taking targeted actions to simplify processes, improve returns”.

Its latest financial reports said revenues had declined as drivers took fewer and shorter trips. “This trend reflect the continuing effect of the cost-of-living crisis, which is dampening demand for discretionary spending,” it said.

London's Unique Challenges

However, industry observers noted that London has particular issues that made it difficult for the sector to succeed.

  • Inconsistent Rules: Across 33 boroughs, car-club operators face a mosaic of different procedures and costs that made it harder.
  • New Costs: The closure coincides with electric cars start paying London’s congestion charge, adding unavoidable costs.
  • Parking Permit Disparity: Residents in some boroughs pay as little as £63 for a year’s electric car parking permit. A floating car club would pay over £1,100 annually, creating a major disincentive.

“Our fees should be one-twentieth of a private parking cost,” said Robert Schopen of Co Wheels. “We’re taking cars off the street. We’re putting less polluting cars in their place.”

A European Example

Other European countries offer models for London to follow. Germany enacted national shared mobility laws in 2017, providing a unified system for parking, support and exemptions. Now, the country has 5.4 shared cars per 10,000 people, while France has 2.1 and Belgium has 6.3. The UK lags behind at 0.7.

“What we see is that shared mobility around the world, particularly on the continent, is growing,” commented Bharath Devanathan of Invers.

Devanathan said authorities should start to view vehicle clubs as a form of mass transit, and integrate it with train and bus stations. He added that a potential operator was already seriously considering entering the London market: “There will be fill this gap.”

The Future Landscape

Other players can be split into two models:

  1. Fleet Operators: Which maintain their own cars. This includes Denmark’s GreenMobility, France’s Free2Move, and Germany’s Miles Mobility.
  2. Peer-to-Peer Services: Which allow users to hire out their own vehicles via an app – a kind of Airbnb for cars. Examples Britain’s Hiyacar and the US’s Getaround and Turo.

Turo, a US-headquartered P2P service, is assessing the UK gap. Rory Brimmer, its UK head, said there was a “big opportunity” to win more users. “A space exists that is going to need to be filled, because London still needs to move,” Brimmer said.

However, it could take some time for other players to establish themselves. For now, more people may choose to buy cars, and many across London will be left without access.

For the volunteers in Rotherhithe, the coming weeks will be a rush to find a way. The delivery problem caused by Zipcar’s exit highlights the wider implications of its departure on community groups and the prospects of shared mobility in the UK.

William Soto
William Soto

A wellness coach and writer passionate about holistic health and empowering others to find their inner glow through mindful practices.