🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."